教科书是否要循环使用(插图)

最近，网上展开一场关于“教科书是否要循环使用”的辩论。假如你是Li Hua，请你向报社写信谈谈你自己的一些想法。要点如下：

　　(1.)据说我国的教科书寿命一般是半年，而美国则是五年。这说明浪费严重;

　　(2.)我国有两亿两千万学生，每年要用三十亿本教科书，这就需要消耗一千一百万棵树木。如果将教科书的寿命在延长一年的话，那么将节省好多树木;

　　(3.)许多贫困家庭的学生买不起教科书，如果将不用的教科书赠给他们岂不是更好?

　　(4.)你的看法(至少两点)。

　　要求：

(1).语句通顺，结构合理;

(2).开头和结尾已给出，不记入总词数(字数：150左右)

(3).参考词汇：lifespan 寿命

　　Dear Editor,

　　Recently there has been an argument about the reuse of textbooks on the internet. ___________________________________________________________

　　Best wishes,

　　Yours truly,

　　Li Hua

　　Liuxuepaper.com's One possible version:

　　Dear Editor,

　　Recently there has been an argument about the reuse of textbooks on the internet. I am writing to talk about it.

　　最近网络上关于教科书循环使用的讨论引发了广泛关注。在此我想谈谈自己的看法。

　　As we all know, the average lifespan of a copy of a textbook is only half a year in our country while in America it is five years or so, which shows we waste too much. There are 220 million students consuming 3 billion textbooks each year, so about 11 million trees are needed to produce them! If the lifespan of textbooks could be extended for one more year, a large number of trees could be saved each year. In addition, many children from poor families can’t afford textbooks. Will it be good if we can afford them to reuse the books?

众所周知，我国教科书的平均使用寿命仅为半年左右，而美国的教科书通常能使用五年之久，这反映出我国存在严重的资源浪费现象。全国每年有2.2亿在校生消耗约30亿册教科书，相当于需要砍伐1100万棵树木！若能将教科书使用寿命延长一年，每年就能挽救大量森林资源。此外，许多贫困家庭的孩子无力承担教材费用，倘若我们能推行教科书循环使用制度，不正是雪中送炭之举吗？

　　So I suggest that all of us should encourage students to take care of their textbooks, and not only does it do good to us but also to nature. At the same time, this can also help us develop awareness of thriftiness.

因此我倡议，我们应当共同引导学生养成爱护教科书的习惯。这不仅有利于资源节约，更能促进人与自然和谐共生。同时，这一举措也有助于培育青少年勤俭节约的品德素养。

作文地带点评：

优点：

观点清晰：文章核心论点明确，即提倡教科书循环使用。

数据支撑：使用中美教科书寿命对比、学生数量、树木消耗等具体数据，增强了说服力。

逻辑结构：遵循了“提出问题-分析问题-解决问题”的基本议论文结构。

情感共鸣：提及贫困家庭学生的困境，从社会公平角度论证，引发读者共情。

可优化之处：

语言表达：部分句子结构较为简单，有中式英语痕迹，可以更地道、更丰富。

开头结尾：开头和结尾略显平淡，可以更精炼、有力。

逻辑衔接：段落和句子间的连接可以更流畅，使用更多样的连接词。

词汇选择：部分词汇可以升级为更正式、精准的学术词汇。

建议部分：建议可以更具体、更具操作性。

参考作文地带原创的英语范文

To the Editor,

Subject: Advocating for a Sustainable Textbook Recycling System

I am writing to express my full support for the growing online discussion regarding the implementation of a nationwide textbook recycling program. The current linear model of textbook consumption in our country presents a significant economic and environmental challenge that demands immediate attention.

As evidenced by a stark comparison, the average lifespan of a textbook in China is merely six months, whereas in countries like the United States, it extends to approximately five years. This discrepancy highlights a profound waste of resources. With an annual consumption of nearly 3 billion textbooks by 220 million students, our educational system necessitates the felling of about 11 million trees every year. Simply extending the usable life of each textbook by one year could preserve vast forest ecosystems and substantially reduce our carbon footprint.

Beyond the environmental imperative, a robust textbook reuse system addresses critical issues of educational equity. For students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, the recurring cost of new textbooks poses a considerable financial burden. A structured recycling program would ensure that all children have equal access to essential learning materials, thereby fostering a more inclusive academic environment.

Therefore, I urge relevant educational authorities and schools to consider piloting a systematic textbook recycling initiative. This would involve establishing standardized procedures for the collection, sanitation, and redistribution of used textbooks in good condition. Concurrently, we must cultivate a culture of stewardship among students, encouraging them to treat educational resources with care. Such a practice not only conserves natural resources and alleviates family expenses but also instills the invaluable virtues of frugality and environmental responsibility in the younger generation.

In conclusion, transitioning to a circular economy for textbooks is a pragmatic and ethical step forward. It aligns ecological sustainability with social justice, paving the way for a greener and more equitable future for Chinese education.

Sincerely,

[Liuxuepaper.Com]

优化说明：

标题与称谓：增加了邮件主题，更显正式。

开头更精炼有力：直接表明立场，并将问题定性为“经济与环境挑战”。

语言升级与逻辑强化：

将“argument”改为更中性的“discussion”，“waste too much”升级为“presents a significant...challenge”。

使用“As evidenced by...”等更地道的连接短语。

将贫困家庭段落与环保段落用“Beyond the environmental imperative...”自然衔接，逻辑更紧密。

建议更具体：提出了“试点系统性倡议”、“建立标准化流程”等具体建议，而不仅仅是“鼓励学生爱护课本”。

结尾升华：将意义提升到“循环经济”、“生态可持续性”与“社会公平”相结合的高度，使结论更有分量。

整体风格：采用更正式、客观的学术议论文语调，符合向媒体投稿的文体要求。

编辑:Liuxuepaper.Com原创

作文地带知识拓展: